Glossary and trial notes
Quick definitions for the main terms in this review, plus the current hydroxychloroquine-based trial landscape
This page keeps the dense terms and trial names in one place.
Use it as a companion page while reading the rest of the section.
Review we are unpacking
McGrath MK, Abolhassani A, Guy L, Elshazly AM, Barrett JT, Mivechi NF, Gewirtz DA, and Schoenlein PV (2024).
Autophagy and senescence facilitate the development of antiestrogen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.
Frontiers in Endocrinology. 15:1298423.
Quick glossary
ERα — the estrogen receptor that helps drive many ER-positive cancers
SERM — a drug that blocks the estrogen receptor in breast tissue, such as tamoxifen
SERD — a drug that blocks and degrades the estrogen receptor, such as fulvestrant
Aromatase inhibitor — a drug that lowers estrogen production, such as letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane
CDK4/6 inhibitor — a drug that holds cells in G1 phase, such as palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib
Autophagy — the cell's recycling process
Autophagosome — the membrane pouch that carries cargo to be broken down
LC3-II / p62 — common lab markers used to study autophagy
mTOR — a central nutrient-sensing pathway that regulates growth and autophagy
Senescence — a living but growth-arrested cell state
SASP — inflammatory signals released by senescent cells
Senolytic — a drug that aims to kill senescent cells
Senomorphic — a drug that aims to calm SASP without necessarily killing the cell
ESR1 mutation — a mutation that can activate the estrogen receptor even without normal estrogen input
CYP19A1 — the aromatase gene
Rb — the retinoblastoma protein that helps restrain cell-cycle entry
AMPK — a cellular energy sensor with both pro-death and pro-survival roles depending on context
AKT — a survival-signalling kinase downstream of several growth pathways
GLUT1 — a glucose transporter often increased in resistant cells
Current trial themes
McGrath et al. (2024) point to a growing group of studies using hydroxychloroquine with endocrine or CDK4/6 treatment.
The broad aim is similar across them.
First, induce a treatment-stressed state.
Then, try to stop cancer cells from using autophagy as a shelter.
Trials highlighted in the review include:
NCT03774472 — hydroxychloroquine, palbociclib, and letrozole in the pre-surgery setting
ABBY / NCT04523857 — abemaciclib plus hydroxychloroquine for minimal residual disease in bone marrow
PALAVY / NCT04841148 — hydroxychloroquine with or without palbociclib and avelumab to target dormant bone-marrow tumour cells
CLEVER / NCT03032406 — hydroxychloroquine with or without everolimus in patients with disseminated bone-marrow cells
NCT05953350 — hydroxychloroquine with high-dose palbociclib
These trials are important because they test the sequence concept.
They do not yet prove that autophagy inhibition should be routine care.
The sequencing idea in one line
The authors' practical model is:
Antiestrogen or CDK4/6 pressure first → cells enter autophagy or senescence → autophagy blocker and/or senolytic added later
That is different from treating hydroxychloroquine as a general-purpose add-on.
The proposed value lies in timing.
The six big open questions from the review
Does autophagy keep reversibly senescent cells alive?
Can protective autophagy be blocked without harming the useful cytostatic effect of CDK4/6 treatment?
When is the best time to add a senolytic?
Can cleaner autophagy inhibitors be developed beyond chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine?
How do we measure autophagy inhibition in real patients, not just lab models?
Which marker best identifies the dangerous senescent cells linked to later metastatic relapse?
Why this review matters even before the trials read out
The paper offers a way to connect three things that are often discussed separately:
endocrine resistance
dormant or slow-cycling survival states
the timing of add-on strategies such as hydroxychloroquine or senolytics
Even before definitive trial results, that framing helps make the resistance problem easier to organise.
Bottom line
The terminology in this field gets dense quickly.
The core message stays simple.
ER-positive cells may survive first and resist later.
The trials now under way are testing whether that survival phase can be interrupted more deliberately.
This information is for education only. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please speak with a qualified clinician before making changes to care, medication, or supplement use.
© 2026 Abbey Mitchell. All rights reserved. Please share by URL rather than copying page text.